(no subject)

Not that I have any objection to the result of the case, but has anybody tried projecting the ban on laws of moral disapproval as a general principle?

The item that comes first to mind is animal cruelty laws. However much one might hate the idea of, say, microwaving live cats to death, what's the state's rational interest in preventing such behavior, under the new standard?

Post a comment in response:

From:

Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.

OpenID

Dreamwidth account

If you don't have an account you can create one now.

Subject

HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Formatting type

Message